New Directions in Rushdie Studies (Editorial)
The Journal of Commonwealth Literature
Released five years ago, Salman Rushdie’s memoir Joseph Anton (2012) serves as an important review of his life and oeuvre up to that point, (re)written from the author’s changing ideological positions and reflective of his attitudes one decade into the twenty-first century. Three years later, Rushdie published his most recent novel to date, Two Years Eight Months and Twenty-Eight Nights (2015).
This special issue dedicated to exploring “New Directions in Rushdie Studies” sets out to survey the meaning and impact of this prolific author’s body of work up to the present moment, while highlighting some of the most innovative approaches in the field. Our aim is to offer new insights to the decades-long discussion over how Rushdie, as a writer, critic, and cultural icon, circumvents any categorization. In the pursuit of this aim, we acknowledge and seek to challenge the critical emphasis often placed on “po-fa” Rushdie. This term, coined by Rushdie and theorized by Robert Eaglestone (2013), denotes a popular reading of Rushdie’s work through the lens of the fatwa as a critical turning point. Such an interpretation is understandable, especially given the centrality of the fatwa to Rushdie’s memoir (its title is the alias he adopted while in hiding during the “Rushdie affair”).
Ana, C., & Charlie, W. (2017). New Directions in Rushdie Studies. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 52(3), 417-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989416683544