Predictors of standardized walking obstacle course outcome measures in children with and without developmental disabilities
Department
Physical Therapy
Document Type
Article
Publication Source
Pediatric Physical Therapy
Publication Date
2011-11-28
Volume
23
Issue
4
First Page
365
Last Page
373
Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to determine which characteristics of children predict measures on the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC). Methods: SWOC testing was performed under 3 conditions: (1) walk, (2) walk with a tray, and (3) walk wearing shaded glasses. Trials consisted of standing up, walking the course in 1 direction, and sitting down. Children (n = 440) completed 2 trials per condition. Trial measures included time, and numbers of steps, stumbles, and steps off the path. Relationships were evaluated using Chi-square analyses and significant predictors were determined by multiple logistic regression analyses. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to determine the accuracy of disability as a predictor. Results: Age, weight, and disability were the strongest predictors (P < .05). Increased age and weight predicted shorter time and fewest steps. Disability predicts longer time and most steps. Conclusion: The SWOC is appropriate to screen children for disabilities in functional ambulation. Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Keywords
activities of daily living, adolescent, age factors, body weight, child, developmental disabilities/physiopathology, disability evaluation, motor skills/physiology, physical therapy (specialty)/instrumentation, physical therapy (specialty)/methods, postural balance/physiology, predictive validity, predictive value of tests, preschool, sensitivity, specificity, walking/physiology
DOI
10.1097/PEP.0b013e3182351c3c
Recommended Citation
Kott, Karen M.; Held, Sharon L.; Giles, Elizabeth Francis; and Franjoine, Mary Rose, "Predictors of standardized walking obstacle course outcome measures in children with and without developmental disabilities" (2011). Articles & Book Chapters. 325.
https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/325
https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3182351c3c